Sunday, 9 April 2017

"That's Your Blooming Lot!": a sermon (of sorts) for the final service of Scots' Uniting Church, Sorell, Tasmania, 9th April 2017

Let us pray:

Loving God, the Spirit of Life began the great work of creation.   

Bless these bulbs, pregnant with life. They show us the Easter mystery of new life coming from death and burial. May they burst forth with abundant growth from earth, rain and sun.

You have called us to the honored task of being workers in your garden. Through the rain and these bulbs bring us to a new awareness of your presence in and around us, as we joyfully live in the knowledge of eternal resurrection.

Plant seeds of love in our lives that will grow through the years. Your Son showed us the way. We now ask your guidance to follow it well. We ask this in Jesus’ name. Amen. 

A reading from the Gospel of John, chapter 12, verses 20 to 24.

Now among those who went up to worship at the festival were some Greeks. 21They came to Philip, who was from Bethsaida in Galilee, and said to him, ‘Sir, we wish to see Jesus.’ 22Philip went and told Andrew; then Andrew and Philip went and told Jesus. 23Jesus answered them, ‘The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. 24Very truly, I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit.…

Thanks be to God.  Amen.

A grain is planted. 

As such it dies to itself.

But it grows into new life for others.

So it is with this box of daffodil bulbs which we’ve just blessed.

So it is with this worshipping community which, as of today, formally ceases to worship in this building and which, for a few months now, has been worshipping as part of the Lindisfarne worshipping community within the Clarence Congregation.

A grain is planted. 

As such it dies to itself.

But it grows into new life for others.

These bulbs will not do anyone any good sitting in this box.  We need to distribute them.  I’ll distribute them in a way that symbolises the distribution of those who – up until today – have been part of the worshipping community known as Scots’ Uniting Church, Sorell.

If you get a bulb, please plant it.

The Sorell congregation is now part of the Clarence congregation, with its two worshipping communities at Lindisfarne and at Bellerive.  Here’s some bulbs for Clarence, one bag for each worshipping group.

The Sorell congregation has had a long-standing relationship with the Ningana Home.  Here’s some bulbs for Ningana.

This Uniting Church congregation here in Sorell has lived, worshipped, and witnessed alongside other congregations.  And I have bulbs for two other local congregations, for St. George’s Anglican Church and for our across-the-street neighbours of St. Thomas’s Catholic Church.

This congregation has received great support in its life from the wider Uniting Church, so here’s some bulbs for the Presbytery office in Launceston. 

There are bulbs for individuals, as well.

During our last few months as a congregation, if everyone who came reasonably regularly showed up on the same Sunday, there were eleven of us.  And there’s a bulb for each of the eleven.

Michelle, from the Presbytery Ministers team, did a brilliant job in providing support and encouragement to the congregation in this process.  Here’s a bulb for Michelle.

Over the past five years, there were plenty of people who drove in and provided worship leadership on occasional Sundays.  You know who you are, and there’s a bulb for each of y’all.

And, if there are any bulbs left, please feel free to take one.  (Can I suggest, kids first?)

A grain is planted. 

As such it dies to itself.

But it grows into new life for others.

And, in the words of someone who has planted more than the occasional bulb in Tasmanian soil, and who recently turned ninety:  “That’s your blooming lot!”

So I suppose it’s time to bloom.

In the name of the Trinity of Love: 
Redeemer, and
Giver of Life.

Saturday, 1 April 2017

A few new words and their definitions

A few months ago, while walking past some buildings that displayed brass plates for the various medical specialists who practised therein, I noticed a brass plate for an Ear, Nose and Throat Consultant whose name was Dr. Garg.  I observed that this distinguished medico may well have been the person who invented gargling.  (Sorry about this, but this is just the way my mind works.)

Frequently, particularly in the field of medicine, people's names are attached to diseases they've discovered or to medical equipment they've invented.  If your surname is something like Alzheimer or Condom, you may well have a distinguished medical person in your family tree.  (But, nevertheless, it's still rather tedious to be lumbered with such a name while you're in high school.)

I've coined a few terms in recent months, based on the names of people who've inspired the words.  I hope you like them.

Cundallination (noun, with verb form to Cundallinate):   the act of urinating on a lemon tree with the intent of helping the tree to grow and to produce large lemons.  (from Peter Cundall, colourful Launceston horticultural and media identity).

Dawk, to (verb):  to parlay expertise in an area in which one is an acknowledged expert (say, evolutionary biology) into the right to pontificate on subjects in which one has no expertise (say, theology, philosophy, politics).  (from Professor Richard Dawkins, colourful Oxford scientific identity).

Lathamectomy (noun):  the dismissal from a position of responsibility (by a media organisation, political party, religious denomination, academic institution, business enterprise, etc.) of an individual whose outrageous public utterances have proved to be a liability for the organisation, usually well after the outrageous statements have done irreparable damage to the organisation concerned.  (from Mark Lathan, colourful Canberra political identity, turned colourful Sydney media identity).
Pellgrimage (noun):  the act of leaving one's country of residence ostensibly for religious reasons, but also to avoid involvement in embarrassing legal proceedings (from Cardinal George Pell, colourful Ballarat religious identity, turned colourful Melbourne religious identity, turned colourful Sydney religious identity, turned colourful Vatican City financial identity).

Trumpdashian (adjective):  seriously rich and seriously tacky, simultaneously.  (a composite of the surnames Trump and Kardashian, from Donald J. Trump, colourful Atlantic City gaming identity, turned colourful New York reality television identity, turned colourful Washington political identity; and from the Kardashian family of colourful Los Angeles reality television identities).

I hope you find these new words useful.

Wednesday, 29 March 2017

Confessions of a SWAGMan

I have a confession to make.  I'm a SWAGMan. 

No, that doesn't mean that I'm like the guy in the song "Waltzing Matilda".  

SWAGMan (plural:  SWAGMen) stands for "Straight, White, Anglo, Gentile, Male".  I've just coined this term.  I coined it today, in fact.  I hope you like it.  Please use it.  (If you credit me for it, even better!)

Now, I don't want to see being a SWAGMan as a source of either pride or of shame.  I didn't choose to be born a SWAGMan.  It just happened that way.

Now, there are some good SWAGMen and some bad ones.  As it is with any other group in the community, we SWAGMen spend a lot of time apologising for our own bad apples, rather than celebrating the achievements of more positive members of the SWAGMan community.  I personally don't feel I have the right to claim credit for the achievements of such noted SWAGMen as Charles Dickens, Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Hawking or Bill Gates, but neither do I want to be automatically associated with the crimes, sins, misdemeanours, and general inanities ever committed by any person who happens to be a SWAGMan.   (Yes, I know that Donald Trump, Mark Latham, and Franklin Graham are all SWAGMen, but so are Stephen Colbert and Justin Trudeau.)

I know that the social, political, and economic system of every English-speaking nation in the world is set up to maximise the comfort and ease of those of us who happen to be SWAGMen.  While I don't think I've personally ever tried to deliberately game this system, I know I've benefitted from this arrangement, as every other SWAGMan reading this article also has.  While I've been known to protest this unfairness, my protests haven't been as loud, as direct, or as obnoxious as they could have been.

But, speaking now to my fellow-SWAGMen, I think we need to take a good, hard look at ourselves, guys.  Our sense of universal SWAGMan entitlement is wearing a bit thin with our friends, neighbours, colleagues, and family members who don't happen to be SWAGMen. 

Now look, chaps, we can no longer assume that, when the shortlist for a job includes a mediocre SWAGMan and a few top quality applicants who aren't SWAGMen, the job will always go to the mediocre SWAGMan.  (And before you protest that this isn't fair, believe me, dudes, it is fair.  And it only seems unfair to you if you're a SWAGMan who only listens to the opinions of other SWAGMen.)

And one more thing, those of us who are SWAGMen really need to stop whining about this as if SWAGMen are being treated unfairly when people who aren't SWAGMen are treated a bit more fairly than they were before.  We look seriously ridiculous whenever we whine about SWAGMen being an endangered species.

The game is up, blokes.  The fat lady is singing.  And the song isn't "Waltzing Matilda".

Sunday, 26 March 2017

Compassion and "the little grey cells": a sermon for Mothering Sunday (John 9:1-41)

There are many paths down which a person in a pulpit could walk today on this fourth Sunday in Lent.

I could pick up the theme of Refreshment Sunday, one of the traditional names of this day.  It’s a mid-way point during Lent, and a day when Lenten disciplines are relaxed at least a little bit.  The message of this is that being kind to ourselves is also an important part of the life of faith.  We need to make it very clear, both to others and (more importantly) to ourselves that the life of faith should never be a life of masochism.

Picking up another traditional name for this day, there’s Mothering Sunday, with a wealth of possibilities.

  • One possibility is to pay tribute to all who’ve exercised maternal (or at least maternal-like) compassion in their lives:  mothers, stepmothers, grandmothers, great-grandmothers, mothers-in-law, stepmothers, aunts, teachers, child care workers, pet carers, and so on.

  • Another possibility is to express compassion to those mourning the deaths of their mothers, whether the grief is recent or long-standing.

  • Compassion can also be expressed to those whose memories of either parent – or their memories of both parents – are not happy memories:  people with memories of their parents dominated by abuse, cruelty, neglect, absence, unreliability, or of merely growing up in an environment in which every day was expected to be Mothers’ Day, or Fathers’ Day, or both.

  • Another theme is how churches can be creatively countercultural.  In countries that celebrate Mothers’ Day on its North American date in May, if a church celebrates Mothering Sunday during Lent, there’s at least an implied critique of all the commercialised humbug that now surrounds Mothers’ Day and Fathers’ Day.

  • Another aspect of Mothering Sunday is a social justice one.  There was always a strong theme of child welfare and youth welfare running through the observance of Mothering Sunday in the British Isles, particularly with a concern for the well-being of young people who lived away from home because of work commitments. Similarly, in the early development of Mothers’ Day in North America, an important theme was the notion of the mothers of the world taking united action to promote peace.  (And, in the US, it was originally called “Mothers’ Day for Peace”.)

  • And, if the person in the pulpit wants to be really radical, there is a whole range of maternal metaphors for God within the scriptures that can be explored.  Particularly in the book of Isaiah, there are images of God as giving birth to humanity, and of God breast-feeding humanity.  These are not the predominant images of God in the scriptures, but they’re there, and we need to hear them.

And, moving away from Mothering Sunday, there’s our scripture readings as listed in the three-year lectionary.   The gospel lesson for this day is the incident of Jesus healing a man who was born blind, and doing so on the Sabbath.

While Jesus’ reaction to the blind man was described as immediate, he still needed to weigh up a whole range of concerns in the process:

  • There was Jesus’ profound compassion toward human suffering, a compassion that said “Heal this person now!  (Do not pass GO.  Do not collect …)”

  • There was also Jesus’ profound respect for, and love of, the Torah and traditions of the Jewish people, a respect and love that may have been saying to him “Heal him, but why not wait until the moment the Sabbath is over.”

  • There was also possibly a concern for the well-being of the disciples.  Were they ready … really ready … to face the opposition of the ultraconservative elements in the community, ultraconservative elements sadly found in every faith community? … Could the disciples cope with the wrath of the “Moral Majority” or the spite of the “Religious Right”?

Jesus had to weigh up all these concerns.  He needed to do so quickly.  He used what Hercule Poirot liked to call “the little grey cells”.  And I believe that Jesus calls us to use our “little grey cells” as part of the life of faith.

And Jesus came firmly down on the side of compassion.  And he calls us to do the same thing.  Jesus calls us to a consistent compassion in each aspect of our lives, even if our “little grey cells” may be telling us to fudge the compassion a bit.

And I believe there is a two-fold message in this lesson:
Let us use our "little grey cells" in the life of faith.

Always, always, come down firmly on the side of compassion.

Thursday, 9 March 2017

“Now we are Forty.” … or is that “Now we are Five-Hundred”? (First draft)

“Now we are Forty.” …
or is that “Now we are Five-Hundred”?
Some thoughts on the anniversaries in 2017 of the inauguration of the Uniting Church in Australia and of the beginning of the Protestant Reformation.

Anniversaries, particularly anniversaries ending with a zero (and most particularly those ending with multiple zeros), are often occasions both for looking back and for looking forward.  With most such anniversaries, whether the looking forward is useful or not is often determined by the extent to which the looking back is dominated by uncritical self-celebration, merciless self-flaggelation, or sober self-assessment.

In any event, it is an interesting coincidence that this year of 2017 sees both the fortieth anniversary of the inauguration of the Uniting Church in Australia (22nd June 1977) and the five-hundredth anniversary of the symbolic beginning of the Protestant Reformation, Luther posting his Ninety-Five Theses on the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg (30th October 1517).

For any of us in denominations that see Luther’s act as a part of our heritage, and particularly for those of us within the particular community of the Uniting Church in Australia, this year can be a useful occasion of sober self-assessment.

The heritage of the Reformation

For all of us who are heirs of the Reformation, there are many gifts that this sixteenth-century movement has given to the whole Christian faith.  Most prominent among these gifts, in my mind, are the following affirmations:

·        Our relationship with God is firmly grounded in God’s grace and mercy, not in any attempt on our own part to “earn” a relationship with God.

·        The life of Christian faith must involve an encounter and an active interaction with the Scriptures, both the New Testament and the Hebrew Scriptures.

·        Solid, critical scholarship (biblical scholarship, theological scholarship, historical scholarship, ethical scholarship) is a healthy and essential element of the life of the Christian community.

·        Lay Christians are active participants in the ministry and mission of the Christian Church, not merely passive recipients of ministry.

Five hundred years following the beginning of the Reformation, these affirmations (while characteristic of the Reformation) are not exclusively Protestant concerns.  These are affirmation which, in my observation, are made as enthusiastically by Christians within Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Anglo-Catholic contexts as they are by those within Protestant contexts (and, in some cases, even more so).

Nevertheless, I believe the situation is changing.  Two phrases I use frequently in this context involve:

·        the necessity of all Christians today to do their faith with “a Catholic heart and a Protestant mind”, and

·        the need for those of us in churches which reflect the heritage of the Reformation to move into a “post-Protestant” stage in our life together.

This paper is an attempt to encourage the development of a “post-Protestant” faith within the UCA, and one that clearly operates with “a Catholic heart and a Protestant mind”.

Has Protestantism passed its “use-by date”?

I strongly suspect that, on its own, the Protestant movement within the Christian Church has reached its “use-by” date, like a can of antique peaches in a supermarket.  Just as Communism had “Use by 1989” on its “label”, and just as Market Capitalism had a “label” saying it was “best by” either 2008, 1987, or 1929 (depending on the economists and historians to whom one listens), so also the Protestant movement within Christianity reached its “use-by date” sometime during the past few decades.

It all has to do with our cerebral style of worship.  Most mainstream Protestant churches have a style of worship in which the dominant elements of the service are teaching and learning.  This is the case whether:

·        the teaching and learning takes the form of a traditional sermon or some other form,

·        the style of music and liturgy is “traditional” or “contemporary”,

·        the theology expressed in the worship service is “conservative evangelical”, “liberal / progressive”, “neo-orthodox”, or something in the middle of these three extremes.

In each case, there is the goal (spoken or unspoken) that all worshippers present will learn something about their faith as a result of attending worship.

During our lifetimes, a cultural shift took place in terms of attendance at public worship.  It was no longer seen as necessary for a person to attend a church or synagogue to be regarded as a positive and respectable member of the community.  People no longer felt a need to have an affiliation with a local congregation for a range of non-religious reasons.

When I was a theological student, our lecturer in preaching reminded us never to assume that everyone in the congregation was a believing Christian, and that (particularly in the middle-class congregations most of us would be serving) there would be a significant number of agnostics in the congregation, attending worship for a range of cultural, but non-religious, reasons.  That comment may have reflected the time in the 1950s during which our lecturer was a parish minister himself, but even by the time he made these comments to us in 1975 (let alone by now), most agnostics had already stopped attending worship services.

In all this, our teaching-learning style of worship is based on the assumption that people attend worship services at least partly to learn information about religion.  This is no longer the case, if it ever was.  People living today now have a range of ways (both face-to-face and, increasingly, online) to learn all sorts of information (admittedly, of a wide range of quality) about religion. 

I believe that people today who attend worship services, either regularly or occasionally, do so because they wish to encounter the God worshipped by the community gathered for worship.  In practice, I believe this means that congregations whose service of worship is focused on teaching and learning, and in which the focus is on speaking about God rather than relating with God, may not be the communities of faith that most meet the needs of our wider communities.

What does this mean for the Uniting Church in Australia today?

The UCA’s decline is not a result of Union.

First of all, I want to say that I do not believe that the decline in membership which many congregations of the UCA have experienced in recent decades is the result of the Union that took place in 1977.  This decline is part of being a teaching-and-learning-oriented Protestant denomination in our time of history.  Overseas denominations of similar traditions, but which have not experienced a recent union, have still seen similar declines in membership to that experienced by the UCA.  I believe that, had Union not happened, the UCA’s three parent churches would now be in a similar state of numerical decline as the UCA is now in, or possibly (as I suspect) worse.

There is much to celebrate about the UCA.

Secondly – despite the decline and the malaise we’re currently experiencing as a church – there is much we can celebrate about the life and ministry of the Uniting Church in Australia.

·        We maintain a diverse network of services meeting human need across Australia, through a variety of agencies, including services offered in some of the nation’s most remote areas.

·        We actively stand alongside many of our nation’s most vulnerable communities, including indigenous people, immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.

·        We strongly affirm the ministry of women in every one of our church’s ministries, both lay and ordained.

·        An increasing number of our congregations have committed themselves to be safe places and to be places of welcome for LGBT people.  As a denomination, we are at least open to ministry by LGBT people (with that openness being more of a fact in some places than others).

·        Almost every one of our church’s congregations has a policy of an “open table” at Holy Communion.

·        Across the nation, our local congregations provide effective communities of pastoral care and mutual support both to their members and to people in the congregations’ wider community networks.

There is much we can celebrate about what God is doing in our church.

Our communities need the UCA.

Thirdly, I believe – despite the decline and the malaise we’re currently experiencing as a church – the Uniting Church in Australia needs to continue in existence as worshipping congregations in local communities, for the pastoral good of the communities where we minister. 

·        At a time when many Christian churches in Australia only ordain men, our communities still need the UCA. 

·        At a time when some Christian churches do not welcome members of other churches (or divorced-and-remarried members of their own church) to the Lord’s Table, our communities still need the UCA.

·        At a time when many Pentecostal and Evangelical churches have sold their soul to the “dark side” and live in a Faustian relationship with the extreme political Right, our communities still need the UCA.

·        At a time when many Christian churches do not fully welcome LGBT people into their congregations, our communities still need the UCA.

I don’t know if the UCA will have strength to carry on until our particular existence as a denomination is no longer needed by our communities.  Pray that we may.

The UCA needs to look critically at its worship.

Fourthly, however, we still need to look critically at what we are doing as a church on Sunday mornings.  Whatever else a church may be doing well, if a church is not worshipping well, there is a strong dimension of malaise in the church’s life.

I do not believe that a pattern of church life in which almost all our Sunday morning gatherings, in almost every congregation, are primarily focused on teaching and learning is a sustainable pattern of church life for the UCA in the long term, whether the style is that of:

·        a 1950s-style Preaching Service (the traditional Protestant Service of the Word, but with everything in the service adapted to attention spans formed by commercial television), or

·        a 1970s-style Childrens’ Service (any service that is oriented toward the involvement of children, whether it’s called a “Family Service”, “All-age Worship”, “Messy Church”, or anything else), or

·        any other style of an essentially teaching-and-learning-oriented style of worship.

If these teaching-and-learning experiences are our only worship choices, our future as a worshipping community will not be sustainable in the long run.

Four possible future “strands” of congregational life in the UCA.

For the UCA, or for any other denomination within the mainstream of the Protestant strand of the Church’s life elsewhere, I believe that (if the church is to develop in a healthy way into the future) local worshipping congregations will increasingly be found to express one of four main strands in terms of their worship.

I call the first of these four strands ecumenically liturgical.  Worship each week in this strand is seen as comprising both Word and Sacrament.  There would be a balance of contemporary and traditional language in worship, as there would also be a balance of musical styles.  In some ways, this gathering for worship may look, sound, and feel very similar to a Roman Catholic Mass in the tradition of the Second Vatican Council.  However, there are two highly significant differences between this gathering and the Mass, even in its Vatican II mode:

·        In this gathering for Word and Sacrament, the invitation to receive the Sacrament would be extended to all who are present, rather than only to some (as it is at Mass).

·        In this gathering for Word and Sacrament, the person presiding at the Eucharist could be of either gender, of any marital status, and of a varied range of sexualities, as compared to the person presiding at Mass who is expected to be male, celibate, and heterosexual.

I call the second of these four strands charismatically contemporary.  The weekly gathering in this strand reflects the “praise and worship” tradition of the Pentecostal churches.  However, there are some significant differences between this strand and the average Pentecostal church:

·        These gatherings for praise and worship would be led by people who have a wider grasp of the tradition of the Christian faith, and a more mature and comprehensive understanding of scripture, than is the case in many Pentecostal congregations.

·        These gatherings for praise and worship would have far less of a “showbiz” feel than many services do in Pentecostal congregations.

·        In these gatherings for praise and worship, the sacrament of Holy Communion (however frequently it would be celebrated) will have a more central role in the congregation’s life than it does in many Pentecostal congregations.

·        These gatherings for praise and worship would certainly reject the Faustian relationship that has existed between some Pentecostal churches and the extreme political Right in many English-speaking countries, including Australia.

I call the third of these four strands experientially contemplative.  The gatherings for worship in this strand of church life, which may be weekly or which may be offered at some other frequency, would offer worshippers diverse opportunities to deepen their faith experientially.  These may include such experiences as the profound silence of a Quaker-style Meeting for Worship, … meditation using Eastern Orthodox icons, … walking a medieval-style labyrinth, … reflection on Scripture using the discipline of lectio divina, … exploring Celtic styles of Christian spirituality, … singing meditative worship songs from the TaizĂ© Community… etc.

And the fourth of these strands of congregational life is our existing pattern of teaching-and-learning-oriented congregations, offered for those many worshippers in the life of our congregations who honestly, sincerely, and conscientiously regard this particular pattern of Sunday gatherings as the best way for them to do church and to be church, at least at this time.

Into the future

I believe that the future of the Uniting Church in Australia (and of similar churches overseas) would be best secured if each of these strands of church life were offered in all major centres where the Uniting Church is found. 

I believe the first three strands I’ve mentioned are necessary to carry the UCA into its future, while the fourth strand is essential now if we are to continuing ministering well to the people with whom the UCA is presently in ministry.  Enabling the first three strands of congregations to develop in many communities will depend on the generosity of congregations in the fourth strand.  I have confidence in this generosity.

I believe this future would require that congregations in each of these four strands would need to recognise, affirm, and respect congregations in each of the other strands as being part of the same Uniting Church.  While I first wrote the previous sentence including the phrase “it goes without saying”, I believe we need to say it overtly.  This paper was my attempt to say it.

This paper has recently been accepted for publication in a periodical.  It's been edited and (in my opinion) improved in the process by the publication's editor.  When the paper is published in hard copy later this year, I will post the edited and improved version on this blog.  As of now, I will describe this paper in its title as a "first draft".

Saturday, 25 February 2017

Reflections on a child's t-shirt

Just earlier today, in a supermarket, I saw a little boy wearing a t-shirt that read ...

... "Be thankful I'm not your kid!"

I was concerned.

I didn't know the child, but the little boy seemed like any other child.  He seemed nice enough.  He didn't appear, for example, as if he was trying to maim his sister in any way.

Why would a parent buy this shirt for their kid?

It sends two messages to the child, both negative.

One message was that there was something wrong with this kid.  If a total stranger (such as myself) should be thankful that he was not my child, the implication is that the parents are not thankful that he is their child.  That's a bad impression for any parent to give any child, ... that the child is simply not good enough to be thankful for.

The second message that this t-shirt gives is almost as bad as the first (not quite as bad, but almost as bad).  This message is that the kid is expected to misbehave.  You're saying, "Hey world, watch out for my kid.  He's trouble," whether he is or not.  You're saying is that this child will spend his school years as a Bart Simpson and will grow up to be a Donald Trump.

It gives the signal
  • that this is the kid who will be expected to throw a tantrum in the biscuits aisle,
  • that this is the kid who will be expected to eat the chocolate bar before it's paid for, 
  • that this is the kid who will be expected to pick a fight with another kid, just for the sake of picking a fight.
whether or not this is what is the particular child is actually like. 

Epic fail, parents, epic fail.

Thursday, 23 February 2017

Thoughts on the Royal Commission

Australia's Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse is nearing the end of its lengthy process, nearly five years after it was first commissioned.  The Royal Commission has examined the workings of many organisations (governmental and non-governmental, religious and secular, profit and non-profit, mainly professional and mainly volunteer) that work with children and young people in Australia in terms of the quality of the responses of these organisations to complaints of the sexual abuse of children and young people within these organisations.  The Royal Commission deserves our thanks for the thoroughness of its work.

In my opinion, a few comments need to be made about the information uncovered by the Royal Commission so far:

1.  No organisation that works with children and young people is immune from the issue of child sexual abuse.

2.  The Royal Commission was scrupulously fair in its treatment of all relevant organisations.  No organisation was the recipient of a cover-up.  No organisation was the object of a witch-hunt.

3.  The men (and they were almost all men, rather than women) who were accused of child sexual abuse were inclined to abuse young people before they were in the relevant professional or volunteer roles.  ... They were paedophiles before they were teachers.  ... They were paedophiles before they were policemen.  ... They were paedophiles before they were scoutmasters.  ... They were paedophiles before they were football coaches.  ... They were paedophiles before they were priests or pastors.  ... They went into their jobs because they saw opportunities to groom potential victims.

4.  In the case of faith communities (both Christian and otherwise), while issues of child sexual abuse are far worse in some groups than in others, no faith community is immune from this problem. 

5.  However, two factors exist that determine why the problem of child sexual abuse is far more severe in some faith communities than in others.
  • Child sexual abuse has been a far worse problem in faith communities where the ordained clergy is made up solely of men than it is in those faith communities where both women and men serve as ordained clergy.
  • Child sexual abuse has been a far worse problem in faith communities in faith communities where the only people to whom clergy are accountable are other clergy than it has been where the people to whom clergy are accountable in the conduct of their ministry consist of both lay people and other clergy.
These two factors affect seem to affect both the level of child sexual abuse in any particular faith community and the adequacy of the faith community's response to the abuse.

Again, I believe the Royal Commission deserves our thanks for the solid work that it has done.  Now the hard work begins, as organisations of many different types begin the process of seeking, on the one hand, to make amends with those whom people representing their organisations have injured in the past and, on the other, to safeguard the young people with whom they work from those who would seek to exploit them in the future.